With the subject of intangible assets on the agenda of accountancy standard setters and regulators for some time and increasingly gaining momentum, a new report from the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) and Glasgow University’s Adam Smith Business School examines the issue of Software Development Costs (SDCs) and how they are accounted for.
SDCs – whether outsourced or in-house – could be expected to be a material issue for most companies, especially as the digital economy has grown.
Called The Capitalisation of Intangibles Debate: Software Development Costs, the research has collected and summarised evidence on how many companies capitalise SDCs during the year and how many report Research & Development costs in the income statement, but do not capitalise SDCs during the year. These are defined in the report as capitalisers and non-capitalisers.
The analysis reveals strong variations between countries. Over 80% of companies in China, Japan, Taiwan and Korea referred to software development in their accounts, compared to less than 20% of companies in Mexico, Malaysia and Singapore.
Across the sample, software development was also more likely to be recognised as an asset by more dynamic companies – those that are more international, more acquisitive and more leveraged.
Despite talk of digitalisation, in the period to 2019 software has not grown as a proportion of total assets in these companies. The report not only gives a picture of the current position on reporting software, but also includes good practice examples of disclosure.
ACCA head of corporate reporting Richard Martin said: “There is a large and growing gap between the stock market value of businesses and the net book value shown by their financial statements. By some estimates net book value may be as little as 15% of market value. Some of this gap will be represented by intangibles not recognised in those balance sheets, but which could be even under the existing International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).”
University of Glasgow Professor Ioannis Tsalavoutas added: “The financial statements of all listed companies using IFRS from 39 countries were looked at over the period 2015 to 2019. About half of the accounts did not refer to software costs either as an expense or capitalised as an asset. Of the half that did (about 40,000), 62% capitalised a software asset. Both of those measures are markedly better than we found with R&D costs.”
The findings have implications for standard setters including the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), supporting further the case for a revision of the standard on intangibles (IAS38), but also for those relying on accounts – IFRS may be global standards but this case shows like others that their implementation is far from uniform across the world.
The full report can be found here.