Commission (SEC) held two round tables this month to gather input
for a study on mark-to-market accounting, which was mandated in the
recent Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.
The first round table saw bankers and accountants conflict over
the suitability of fair value accounting measures. The second heard
panellists’ views on the independence of the standard-setting
process, the effects of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Statement 157 Fair Value Measurement (FAS 157) on financial
institutions’ balance sheets and its impact on 2008 bank
Chairman of financial services consultant Secura Group and
former banker William Isaac said in a written statement at the
first round table that the FASB and the SEC should immediately
withdraw FAS 157.
“I believe it is beyond dispute that mark-to-market accounting
has been extremely and needlessly destructive of bank capital in
the past year and is a major cause of the current credit crisis and
economic downturn,” he wrote.
But PricewaterhouseCoopers US assurance managing partner Vincent
Colman said fair value reporting was the best method for providing
the level of transparency markets need to function effectively,
despite any imperfections that it may have.
“Any fundamental change to fair value reporting runs the risk of
reducing confidence among investors and other market participants,
which in turn would likely restrict the flow of capital,” he
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below formBy GlobalData
At the second round table, one panellist, University of North
Carolina professor of accounting Wayne Landsman, defended the
independence of the International Accounting Standards Board and
He said it was not advisable for any accounting changes to take
place because of government intervention in the standard-setting
Landsman added that FAS 157 did not cause banks to write down
their assets in 2008.
“The role FAS 157 played in contributing to these pro-cyclical
effects is, in my view, highly overstated. At most, the
contribution is incremental, bank assets became impaired and
write-downs had to occur,” he said .
The SEC is due to publish the results of the study in
Nicholas Moody and Melanie White