A newly published report by the House of Lords Economic Affairs Finance Bill Sub-Committee has identified that in recent years, there has been an escalation in the abuse of R&D tax relief which has led to a loss of revenue. The relief was subject to large-scale organized criminal attacks and activities of rogue advisers which involve targeting small companies, often persuading them to make invalid claims.

In its most recent accounts, His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) estimated the amount of error and fraud in its two R&D schemes at £469m ($577m).

The Bill was published on 20 July 2022 and the report covers its Research and Development tax relief reforms.

The Bill proposes legislative changes to combat this abuse, including the requirement to provide HMRC with more detailed information about the nature of a claim, naming any tax adviser involved in preparing claims and requiring that claims should be endorsed by a senior officer of the company. It also introduces a requirement to give pre-notification of an intention to make a claim.

The Sub-Committee concluded that these changes would not be effective in isolation and that improvements to HMRC’s compliance capability are also required. This includes a more focused and targeted approach to identifying suspect claims, greater expertise and potentially more resource.

The Sub-Committee:

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.
  • Found that error could be mitigated before claims are made if HMRC improved the support it provides to business. This includes improving both its guidance and communications to increase understanding of the scheme and expanding its existing Advance Assurance process for claims by small and medium enterprises (SMEs). HMRC should also make it clear to taxpayers that, when relief is given under the “process now, check later” approach, it could mean that relief may have to be given back if after checks the relief turns out not to be due.
     
  • Welcomes the extension of the range of qualifying expenditure for which R&D relief is available to include cloud computing and data licensing costs. It also welcomed the Government’s proposal to include pure mathematics within the scope of the definition for R&D. These changes will contribute to ensuring that the UK remains a competitive location for R&D.
     
  • Noted the Government’s proposal to refocus relief activity to expenditure in the UK rather than offshore.  It should consider introducing a form of transitional relief for expenditure on specialised resources which are not currently available in the UK, especially for R&D being carried out under contracts already entered into.

Economic Affairs Finance Bill sub-committee chairman, Lord Leigh of Hurley, said:

“R&D investment, which tax relief supports, makes an important contribution to the UK’s economy and productivity. But fraud and error are costing the taxpayer over £450million each year.

“HMRC’s plans for tackling this problem will not succeed if it doesn’t also improve its compliance capability.

“The Government should use its review of R&D tax relief as an opportunity to look beyond the initial measures within the draft Bill and hold an open-ended consultation on how the scheme can be improved. This will be integral to future proofing the UK’s competitiveness as a hub of R&D activity.”

The Accountant has reached out to HMRC for comment.