• Register
Return to: Home > News > Singapore lags behind in sustainability reporting

Singapore lags behind in sustainability reporting

Companies in Singapore are not as actively involved in sustainability reporting as their Asian counterparts, a survey has found.

The survey, conducted by the ASEAN CSR Network and the Centre for Governance, Institutions and Organisations (CGIO), part of the National University of Singapore, covered corporate information over two years from the start of 2014 to the end of last year.

Based on the top 100 listed companies in Indonesia, Singapore, China and Thailand, Singapore comes last with only 71% of companies reporting on sustainability issues, considerably lower than the 100% shown by the other three.

However, when it comes to the quality of disclosure of sustainability reports Singapore ranks higher with 48.8%, Indonesia at 48.4%, Malaysia at 47.7%, and the highest figure shown by Thailand at 56.8%.

Singapore may however see a rise in the number of companies that conduct sustainability reporting as the Singapore Exchange (SGX) recently introduced a ‘comply or explain’ sustainability reporting initiative, in an effort by the government to step up its commitment to the environment.

Singapore-listed companies will be expected to present a sustainability report at least once a year and must cover five components including: practices and performance targets; material ESG factors; policies, sustainability reporting framework and the board statement.

Companies will be expected to implement the ‘comply or explain’ initiative from financial year ending on or after 31 December 2017.

Commenting on the matter, the Small and Middle Capitalisation Companies Association (SMCCA) said it "welcomes SGX's Sustainability Reporting Guide".

"SGX has softened many requirements ... in view of reducing anxiety to small- and middle-capitalisation companies when implementing this report," added the SMCCA.

GRI framework
Singapore performs slightly better when it comes to the adoption of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The survey revealed that in Singapore 21 companies adopted the framework, higher than Malaysia where the number of companies adopting GRI is 18.

That’s however lower than Indonesia where 28 companies adopted it. Thailand has the highest number of companies adopting GRI at 38, the survey revealed.

Companies in Singapore that do not adopt GRI but rather ‘seek external assurance’ is very low (the same as Indonesia) at four, Malaysia at nine, and Thailand 13.

Based on the results it appears that there is a direct link between the use of the GRI framework and the quality of disclosure, which is generally higher when GRI is implemented.

Although listed companies in the four Asian countries recognise the significance of sustainability reporting, they cannot identify “its key impact, rise and opportunities,” stated the report.  However, they are continually progressing and working towards improving the quality of disclosure, the survey read.

Top Content

    Choosing the right location can have cast-iron benefits

    As Game of Thrones, one of the biggest television shows of all time, comes to an end, Joe Pickard looks at how tax incentives offered to television and film production companies help the wider economy.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.