• Register
Return to: Home > News > HMRC captured by corporate interests and crippled by public accountability deficit: Labour’s independent review calls for reform

HMRC captured by corporate interests and crippled by public accountability deficit: Labour’s independent review calls for reform

An independent review commissioned by the UK Labour party to be released today  (8 September) is expected to recommend tackling a perceived public accountability deficit, the main structural problem of the UK tax collection authority, which is seen as being too close to big corporations, The Accountant has learnt.

The independent review is entitled Reforming HMRC: Making it Fit for the Twenty-First Century and is the result of an investigation of a fourteen-strong team of experts led by Prem Sikka, professor of accounting at the University of Essex.

The independent review, which Labour will use to inform its policy making, was commissioned in October 2015 and submitted in the end of April. It’s based on the external input of over one hundred business advisers and 2,100 HMRC employees surveyed.

One of its main findings is that HMRC suffers a crisis of public accountability, in the sense that the UK tax authority seems to be too tough on smaller taxpayers and too lenient on big corporations when it comes to collecting revenues and following up inspections.

In the UK, the tax gap (the amount of uncollected tax, due among other reasons to avoidance and evasion) ranges from the Government’s £35bn figure to the £120bn figure ($46bn to $160bn), which watchdogs and many commentators suggest.

Among the recommendations is to create a supervisory board made up of stakeholders, including employees, SMEs and taxpayers in an attempt to make the organisation more accountable to the public.

The review is expected to raise concerns about the cuts on staff, at least 40,000 employees in the last 12 years, which has reduced the quality of services for ordinary taxpayers.

In addition, the review might highlight that accountancy firms, often masterminds of avoidance schemes, outnumber HMRC’s transfer pricing specialists by at least five times.

However, the review would emphasise that every one pound invested in anti-avoidance measures by HMRC generates £76 of income.

Another issue expected to be underscored by the review is that although the number of prosecutions has increased, almost a third of those are petty cases which amount to less than £10,000, thus missing out on the big corporations able to avoid or evade higher tax revenues.

Top Content

    Audit for SMEs how wide should the net be?

    The European Federation of Accountants and Auditors for small and medium-sized enterprises (EFAA) president Bodo Richardt, and director, Paul Thompson share their views on a recent report by the Swedish National Audit Office on the supposed benefits of dropping audit requirements for SMEs. Interview by Vincent Huck

    read more

    Draft EU directive targets tax intermediaries

    Tax intermediaries involved in schemes that could be seen as being ‘of interest’ to the authorities will have to disclose this. The new rule also raises questions over the integrity of the profession. Joe Pickard reports

    read more

    Editor's letter: Arrivederci Accountancy

    Arrivederci Accountancy

    read more

    Comment: Cheesy take on tax

    Vincent Huck finds the arguments on compliance v ethics are full of holes

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.