• Register
Return to: Home > Comments > Editor's letter: The IR eagle has landed

Editor's letter: The IR eagle has landed

Nicola Maher, The Accountant editor

The eagle has landed - and by "the eagle", I mean the draft of the world's first integrated reporting framework. (See: In focus - Integrated reporting framework)

The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), which is behind the creation of the framework, held launch events this month in 15 locations around the world including Canada, China, Germany, Hong Kong, South Africa, Switzerland, India, Brazil, Singapore, Australia, Japan, the UK and the US. This is a clear indicator of the growing reach this relatively new initiative already has.

This event is every bit the big deal it's billed as, since Integrated Reporting (IR) represents a huge shift in corporate reporting. The last time any great significant innovation came to the world of reporting was in the 1980s, when companies - mainly in the chemical sector - began reporting on their environmental impact to try and improve their image.

The IIRC has made it clear it is not trying to compete with other forms of corporate reporting, and while that may be true it certainly does not mean it won't come up with something better and more usable.

Current forms of corporate reporting are often seen as cluttered and indecipherable by analysts, investors and the wider stakeholder community. IR has a shot at changing this.

What the IR framework aims to do is concisely communicate how an organisation's strategy, governance, performance and prospects lead to the creation of value in the short, medium and long-term. Overall, it's a question of integrative as opposed to "silo" thinking.

The principles-based draft framework, which covers issues such as concepts of capital, the business model and value creation, is not without challenges. For example, it will require companies producing reports to work out what is material - and there are also questions over the provision of assurance.

For investors and stakeholders to have any sort of confidence that the information contained in their reports is accurate, assurance of some sort is going to be vital. There is an ongoing debate over who should provide that assurance, but it seems auditors are the right people for the job.

After all, they have been working with sustainability and CSR reports since they have been around, meaning they have built up substantial knowledge of accounting for non-financial information.

Why now
Like me, you may be wondering why IR has only just come to fruition when, even to a non-accountant such as me, it makes a lot of sense. Quite simply, the initiative is being driven by the market- and it only became clear when the global financial crisis hit, that a new form of reporting with fewer compliance requirements and more integrative thinking and decision-making was needed.

While there is some way to go before widespread adoption, this market-led initiative is certainly on its way. When the IR framework version 1.0 arrives later this year, there will no doubt be creases to iron out but with so much support from such a wide range of businesses, regulators, standard setters, accounting bodies and NGOs, I don't doubt there will be a large uptake in the years to follow.

Top Content

    Choosing the right location can have cast-iron benefits

    As Game of Thrones, one of the biggest television shows of all time, comes to an end, Joe Pickard looks at how tax incentives offered to television and film production companies help the wider economy.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.