• Register
Return to: Home > Comments > Editor's letter: Lobbying and the City (of Brussels)

Editor's letter: Lobbying and the City (of Brussels)

Carlos Tornero, editor, The Accountant

There is nothing to be ashamed of lobbying. Everyone, even in our daily life, does it. It might even be one of the world's oldest professions, as defined by the UK Public Affairs Council, an industry body.

According to that definition, lobbying in a professional capacity means attempting to influence (or advising those who wish to influence) governments or parliaments on any matter of their competence. Therefore such a human activity seems to be as old as the hills.

But if lobbying was a sport it could certainly be played by the rules or rather be gently pushed out of the limits of sportsmanship - again, nothing extraordinary that wouldn't apply to every field of life or to every competition.

As member states brace for the implementation of the EU audit rules, one could only image how busy the last four years must have been for lobbyists and interested parties in the reform debate.

All the fuss started in 2010 when the European Commission issued its green paper Audit Policy: Lessons from the crisis. Bold proposals to re-establish investor confidence in the audit profession were issued, as many didn't understand why collapsing financial institutions were given a clean bill of health by their auditors before the crisis struck.

Among the most controversial measures of the reform, aimed also at enhancing auditor independence, were mandatory firm rotation and restriction to non-audit services provided to audited public interest entities.

Within the profession some stakeholders welcomed the proposed audit reform -some more than others. And equally, some of them were more vocal than others while lobbying in Brussels. From the text finally passed by the European Parliament in June 2014 everyone can draw his own conclusion.

But does the lobbying stop here? Reflecting the areas where agreement couldn't be reached by EU lawmakers, the text (definitely not a friendly read) left a large number of options that should be decided by member states before June 2016.

Some are concerned that this could erode efforts to achieve harmonisation in the EU and ultimately the single market. However, could this be an argument to discredit the unstoppable reform of the EU audit industry?

Right now, before the reform comes into force, the EU audit market can't be more fragmented with twenty-eight different systems. Even the most diverse implementation of EU rules shouldn't make this worse.

Another point often overlooked is that this reform was made to win back investors to the EU. Frank Curtiss, head of corporate governance at a UK long-term investor fund, said recently that the investor community is concerned about non-audit services. If they are excessive, he said, they can compromise auditor independence.

Curtiss noted that a debate should be encouraged about whether those services need to be in "a longer blacklist or a shorter whitelist or the fifty shades of grey in between".

As Curtiss rightly said, the devil is in the details. This issue of The Accountant explores those details and the twenty-eight shades of grey that the EU audit rules offer to member states.

Carlos Martin Tornero

Related story
Auditors: sinners or saints?

Top Content

    Choosing the right location can have cast-iron benefits

    As Game of Thrones, one of the biggest television shows of all time, comes to an end, Joe Pickard looks at how tax incentives offered to television and film production companies help the wider economy.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.