• Register
Return to: Home > Comments > Don’t miss a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity

Don’t miss a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity

Doctor Who said "In the parallel world everything's the same just a little bit different". He may well have been describing the two worlds of the international accounting standard setters - the for-profit private sector focused International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and its public sector twin the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB).

Currently, the two boards are separately developing the fundamental building blocks that form the foundations of financial reporting. And they are arriving at different decisions about those frameworks. For example, each has a different view on the elements of financial statements. In contrast to the IASB's framework, the IPSASB's framework proposes additional elements of financial statements including 'deferred inflows' and 'deferred outflows'. Further, each has attached different meanings to fundamental concepts like presentation and disclosure.

The consequences of different decisions on frameworks are likely to be felt in the development of accounting standards. There is a real risk that each standard setter will develop accounting standards that treat comparable transactions in similar circumstances very differently. This could in turn be an unhelpful contribution to the efforts underway to enhance the credibility of financial statements.

I acknowledge that there is justification for some differences in those frameworks. After all, the purpose of for-profit private sector companies is very different from government departments and other government entities; and the users of public sector financial statements extend beyond the IASB's focus on resource allocation decisions by capital providers.

Shortly, our colleagues in New Zealand will enter a dimension that may well require them to deal with colliding parallel worlds. The New Zealand accounting standard setter has issued a package of accounting standards that will apply to all New Zealand government entities except Government Business Enterprises (GBEs) from 1 July 2014. Those new standards are largely based on the current standards of the IPSASB which are very similar to IFRS. Different decisions by the IASB and IPSASB about frameworks are likely to increase the differences between IPSAS and IFRS, not narrow them and the consequences are something that New Zealand is currently exploring.

While government activities are typically not-for-profit, its GBEs are very much for-profit. Consequently, the activities of government are mixed. One possible challenge for New Zealand is how its whole-of-government financial statements can report on the activities of government departments and GBEs if the IASB and IPSASB frameworks do in fact require like transactions to be treated differently.

Now is the time for the IASB and IPSASB to work together. To not do so is to miss a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to rid ourselves of parallel worlds. And if they don't - I suggest you watch "Doomsday" the 13th and final episode in the 2006 series of Doctor Who.

Alex's previous blog post

Tone at the top and Integrated Reporting

Top Content

    Choosing the right location can have cast-iron benefits

    As Game of Thrones, one of the biggest television shows of all time, comes to an end, Joe Pickard looks at how tax incentives offered to television and film production companies help the wider economy.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.