• Register
Return to: Home > Comments > Comment: Communicating for a better audit

Comment: Communicating for a better audit

By Instituto dos Auditores Internos do Brasil (IIA Brazil) director Paulo Gomes


Auditing is the art of communicating. Few people connect the concept of an internal auditor to the image of a professional capable of showing admirable characteristics in the strategic role of transmitting information. Among the many revelations uncovered by Operation Car Wash, one of the most important ones – and barely touched on by the media – is the combination of a lack of integration with the redundancy in the actions of control and inspection mechanisms operating in Brazil.

There is an immense paradox between the massive investments made in the past two decades in controls and regulations to prevent fraud, and the flood of barbarities revealed by the largest corruption investigation ever tackled in world history. The math does not add up, but there are explanations for this. If we had to define in a simple way the complex situation of fragility that we currently experience, it would be fair to say that: we have many organisms in place that do not speak the same language, surrounded by dangerous sparks around bonfires of vanity.

There is a tangle of unfortunate bureaucratic overlaps, coupled with an absurd amount of rework, resulting in the ineffectiveness of various inspection and control systems, generating costs beyond necessary. Any large company is subject to evaluation by numerous review bodies, and for state-owned organizations, the verifications almost double. Transactions, processes, purchases and sales, almost everything, in theory, goes through area managers, internal control, risk department, compliance and the internal audit itself, which tests what was previously audited, in addition to making a comprehensive assessment of the entire company. It should interact with the forementioned bodies, including the ethics committee and the ombudsman.

Now joining the team of misconduct fighters, we have external bodies, such as: external audit, regulatory bodies and municipal, state and federal controllerships, represented by the CGU (at the federal level) and by the municipal courts (TCM), the states (TCE) and the federation (TCU). There is also the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Federal Police, the Financial Activities Control Council (COAF), among others. Most of these institutions have the sole purpose of preventing and stopping corruption.

With this entire gear at our disposal to fight irregularities, it would seem that we live in a safe scenario, but not really. In a country where the concept of mishmash is almost a cultural factor, it is not surprising to realize that there is a lack of communication and integration between all powers that be, which hinders the chance of an effective fight against irregularities. The elements defining who is responsible for a each particular action need to be clearer and more objective. It is common to hear from security experts that, if there is no intelligence exchange between civil, military and federal police, crime will continue to win the war. When fighting for corporate ethics, the analogy should not be any different.

Among so many partners involved in the analysis and investigation processes, there are gaps that are used strategically by fraudsters. Despite the technical competence of supervisory bodies, the lack of communication creates a patchwork made of flaws, portraying a control system that is broad, but unable to provide the result our society expects.

The excessive red tape is also seen as one of the culprits for the weakness in our risk control systems. While some areas get stuck, others take advantage of the vacuum left behind by incoherent actions to commit the most creative and harmful illicit acts, from rigging bidding processes to manipulating results and balances.

Rework is common occurance in our society, with strong cultural roots. The competitiveness and agility in giving positive responses in operations sometimes bring about utopias such as those that occur, for example, in the infamous proceedings in our country’s judiciary. We have to be careful and prevent control bodies from running into each other in identical assessment processes, where 'ego' disputes commonly occur in order to identify those responsible for taking action.

While internal or external control bodies audit an organization without communicating the scope of the work, important processes and procedures may be left uncontrolled. In this limbo, a gap creates the perfect opportunity for misconduct. In this wicked game, the loser – of course – is the people, that can no longer stand so much inefficiency.

After Operation Car Wash, supervisory bodies should review the way they perform, in search of a formula to avoid sacrificing productive areas with an overload of redundant requests and rework. Without a macro, cohesive communication project, incluing appropriate training, the use of technology and the integration between these control bodies, Operation Car Wash’s cleaning jet will have only removed some of the dirt from the ethical chaos that hits the country. We have to cry out for integrated audits to be effective, and not seen simply as cost drivers for companies, unable to avoid the serious fallouts of corporate fraud.

*Paulo Gomes serves as Director at Instituto dos Auditores Internos do Brasil – IIA Brasil

Top Content

    Addressing tax challenges and the digitisation of the economy

    As the economy becomes even more globalised through digital sources, the tax systems currently in place need to be scrutinised to examine whether they are still fit for current and emerging business models. Joe Pickard reports on the OECD’s approach to this issue.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.