• Register
Return to: Home > News > Regulation > USA Congress buries transparency and anti-corruption requirements for USA listed extractive companies

USA Congress buries transparency and anti-corruption requirements for USA listed extractive companies

On 3 February, the Congress of the USA voted to dismantle the SEC implementation of Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act 2010, a transparency and anti-corruption rule mandating USA listed extractive companies to disclose payments of $100,000 or more made to the foreign governments where they do business at project level during one fiscal year.

The SEC rule had been in the making for many years but due to resistance, mainly from the USA extractive Industry, it was only issued in June 2016. In the meantime, similar disclosure rules have been introduced in the European Union, Norway and Canada.

The SEC implementation of the transparency rule had been a bipartisan initiative sponsored by Democrat Senator Ben Cardin and former Republican Senator Richard Lugar, also known as the Cardin-Lugar coalition, that gathered the support from user of financial statements, in particular institutional investors.

In order to promote comparability, all the reporting regimes (the USA one now being repealed, as well as those in Canada and Europe), allowed to report these payments using the standard of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI).

On 1 February the House of Representatives voted 235-187 to repeal Section 1504 and the Senate followed suite on 3 February.

 The American Petroleum Institute, an industry lobby group, had successfully sued the SEC's implementation on the grounds that it puts USA listed companies at a competitive disadvantage as it requires them to disclose confidential information to foreign competitors.

This legal challenge in the courts forced the redraft of the implementation rules, which were finalised in 2016. This delay enabled Republicans at the Financial Services Committee of the House of Representatives to promote a motion of disapproval using the mechanism of the Congressional Review Act. This grants powers to overturn rules of federal agencies recently finalized by an outgoing administration.

In December 2015, at the time of the consultation launched to seek feedback, SEC commissioner and now acting chair Michael Piwowar, expressed opposition to the proposed rules and issued a dissenting statement. Michael Piwowar said that such a disclosure regime was contrary to the SEC's core mission, which must serve investors and not special interests.

"Provisions such as Section 1504 have nothing to do with helping investors. This is yet another situation where politically-connected special interests are using shareholder resources to push their own agenda.

"There is no difference between a company executive who takes resources out of the corporate treasury for his or her own self-interest and a special interest group that does the same," Piwowar said.

He also noted that the rules could put publicly-traded companies at a competitive disadvantage compared to private and foreign companies that are not subject to the SEC's oversight.

The fact that those companies would not be subject to the rule, Piwowar said, "actually undercuts the transparency objectives of Section 1504."

He also expressed concerns over the project-level payment information.

"That information might be used by third-party actors, including non-profit and non-governmental organizations, as a means to extract their own payments in return for not opposing various projects throughout the world."

However, an investor coalition representing $5.6 trillion in AUM that commended the SEC for its leadership in implementing Section 1504 as "the rules were carefully considered and reflected investors’ substantial interest in oil, gas and mining industry payment transparency."

The coalition of institutional investors added: "The SEC’s leadership encouraged the development of a public global disclosure standard that includes the European Union Transparency Directive and regulation under development in Canada.

Top Content

    Choosing the right location can have cast-iron benefits

    As Game of Thrones, one of the biggest television shows of all time, comes to an end, Joe Pickard looks at how tax incentives offered to television and film production companies help the wider economy.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.