• Register
Return to: Home > News > Standards > US investors renew call for audit partner disclosure

US investors renew call for audit partner disclosure

The US Council of Institutional Investors (CII) has urged the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to pursue the inclusion of an engagement partner disclosure requirement into the scope of PCAOB's policy standards agenda.

"The Council strongly supports requiring disclosure in the auditor's report of the name of the engagement partner," a letter to the PCAOB signed by CII general counsel Jeff Mahoney read.

According to the CII, disclosure in the auditor's report of the name of the engagement partner would facilitate the ability of shareowners to obtain useful information about the track record of lead audit partners.

This is "information that many investors demand and deserve to know", CII continued.

The CII thereby renewed its call for engagement partner disclosure from the past, when it also objected that the PCAOB proposals did not require the audit partners to physically sign their audit reports by name.

"We would have preferred that the PCAOB require the signature of the engagement partner," a previous CII letter addressing the PCAOB stated. "However, we continue to believe the required disclosure of the name of the engagement partner has most of the potential benefits as the signature requirement."

Previously, the PCAOB discarded the idea of requiring auditors to sign their reports on a mandatory basis; but chairman James Doty told The Accountant in a July interview he personally saw the need for the auditors to have at least an option to sign their reports.

"All the major markets, except the US have it. Auditors are living with it in most countries around the world except here," Doty said. "We're not expecting them to sign; we are giving auditors alternatives about whether further to disclose the name."

In opposition to the investors' view, the US audit profession showed little support for the idea of a mandatory signature on the audit reports.

"What value will it bring to the end-user to have the engagement partner physically sign the audit report with their names instead of the name of the firm," the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants vice-president firm services and global alliances Mark Koziel told The Accountant in an interview for the US country survey.

"Auditors are already doing the best job they possibly can and signing their name is not going to raise the level of quality of the audit," Koziel argued.

Related stories:

James Doty interview: Countdown to PCAOB's inspections of Chinese audit firms

Country survey: USA's ins and outs


Top Content

    2018 Digital Accountancy forum and awards: Digital transformation

    The Accountant presents highlights from The Digital Accountancy Forum & Awards 2018 panel discussions

    read more

    2018 Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: Tech deep dive

    The second panel session of the day saw experts discuss how new technologies should not just be seen as a threat, and could be used to improve accounting.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The power of data

    The third panel discussion of the day saw panellists discuss some of the worries their clients have had, how to overcome them, and how data and technology are providing real business opportunities.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The next generation

    With young people more mobile, and technology changing the industry rapidly, the final panel session of the Digital Accountancy Forum looked at how firms would need to adapt to the new reality

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.