• Register
Return to: Home > News > Standards > The UK Financial Reporting Council increases levels of fines

The UK Financial Reporting Council increases levels of fines

The UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published updated guidance for the Tribunal that hears FRC Enforcement cases increasing its fines to £10m ($14.1m) or more for seriously poor audit work by a Big Four firm. Other updates to its sanctions include the potential exclusion from the profession for a minimum of 10 years, greater use of financial penalties and sanctions that reflect the level of cooperation by respondents.

The updated guidance has implemented the recommendations which were provided by a publication by an independent review of the sanctions in October 2017. The review was undertaken by a panel chaired by former Court of Appeal for England and Wales judge Christopher Clarke.

Alongside the sanctions, guidance was also published to best inform the Tribunal on when to impose the sanctions upon a member or member firm.

The report offered reasoning that sanctions should not just be issued as punishment for the member or the member firm but also to assert the credibility of the profession. When determining the amount of a fine to be issued the report stated that the tribunal should consider how it will ‘promote the public confidence in the regulation of the accountancy profession’.

The guidance recommends the Tribunal to exclude a member from the accounting profession when the level of misconduct is ‘so damaging to the wider public and market confidence’ in the conduct of members, the accountancy profession and the quality of the corporate reporting in the UK.

The report offers guidance on certain mitigating factors for the Tribunal to consider before imposing sanctions. These include whether the member firm has had a previous history of misconduct, if a member held a junior position, and if the member or member firm was not intending to profit from the misconduct.

While it is considered a mitigating factor if the member or member firm reported the misconduct to the FRC, cooperation with the FRC’s tribunal is not considered a mitigating factor in itself. Only extreme cooperation will be considered as a mitigating factor as there is already requirement of the member or member firm to cooperate with an investigation.

The FRC’s updated sanctions guidance will take effect on 1 June 2018.

By Joe Pickard

Top Content

    ARGA team, assemble!

    The new top team has been named that will see in root-and-branch reform at the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) as it transforms into the Audit, Reporting and Governance Authority (ARGA). Will the new duo be as dynamic as some are hoping? Robin Amlôt reports.

    read more

    FASB: a quest for simpler standards

    FASB chair Russell Golden addressed the IMA 2019 Annual Conference and Expo at the Sheraton San Diego Hotel and Marina, California, on 18 June. IMA immediate former chair-emeritus Alex Eng acted as moderator. Joe Pickard reports.

    read more

    The future of audit, and how to get there

    Two recent reports peer into the future of the audit profession. One analyses what an audit should offer, while the other looks at how the audit process will be carried out. Robin Amlôt takes a closer look at both.

    read more

    EFAA elects new president, focuses on digital future

    EFAA’s new president, Salvador Marin, outlined his key priorities for the next two years at the organisation’s 2019 annual general meeting, while outgoing president Bodo Richardt offered advice. Robin Amlôt reports.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.