• Register
Return to: Home > News > IFAC offers alternatives to Monitoring Group’s proposed reform of the international audit and ethics standard-setting process

IFAC offers alternatives to Monitoring Group’s proposed reform of the international audit and ethics standard-setting process

The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has published its initial views to the Monitoring Group Consultation Paper on changes to the international audit and ethics standard-setting process.

The Monitoring Group, which consists of a number of international financial institutions and regulatory bodies committed to advancing the public interest in areas related to international audit standard setting and audit quality, last month published a consultation paper proposing to change the current standards setting model on the basis that standards were not developed fully in the public interest. IFAC said it agreed with some aspects of the paper, including the introduction of a multi-stakeholder model, broad geographical representation, sufficient checks and balances as well as a review of the nominations process.

However, IFAC highlighted its concern about the fact that the consultation paper offers no evidence for such a drastic change and that fundamental key issues are omitted from it or deferred, including: funding, oversight and governance, transition process, and an impact and risk assessment.

In its position paper, IFAC list seven possible reforms which would strengthen the current standards setting model as an alternative to the changes advocated by the Monitoring Group.

These reforms include:

  • The introduction of nominations arrangements that comprise other stakeholder groups;
  • That the role and operating processes of the PIOB be clarified and followed;
  • A more explicit multi-stakeholder standard-setting board composition;
  • Funding arrangements to which all stakeholder groups contribute, with transparent and independent oversight;
  • Reconsider the optimum size of the standard setting boards, suggesting that it could be smaller;
  • Retain separate standard-setting boards for auditing and assurance, and ethics for the entire accountancy profession;
  • Examine the scope to redesign processes and operations of the standard-setting boards for greater efficiency and effectiveness.

Meanwhile, the Monitoring Group welcomes all feedback from stakeholders, to be submitted by 9 February 2018, the consultation is available here.

Top Content

    Audit for SMEs how wide should the net be?

    The European Federation of Accountants and Auditors for small and medium-sized enterprises (EFAA) president Bodo Richardt, and director, Paul Thompson share their views on a recent report by the Swedish National Audit Office on the supposed benefits of dropping audit requirements for SMEs. Interview by Vincent Huck

    read more

    Draft EU directive targets tax intermediaries

    Tax intermediaries involved in schemes that could be seen as being ‘of interest’ to the authorities will have to disclose this. The new rule also raises questions over the integrity of the profession. Joe Pickard reports

    read more

    Editor's letter: Arrivederci Accountancy

    Arrivederci Accountancy

    read more

    Comment: Cheesy take on tax

    Vincent Huck finds the arguments on compliance v ethics are full of holes

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.