• Register
Return to: Home > News > WCOA Rome: High expectations ahead of Integrated Reporting debate in Rome

WCOA Rome: High expectations ahead of Integrated Reporting debate in Rome

Rome, Italy (WCOA 2014). Global accountancy stakeholders will debate Integrated Reporting (IR) next Thursday on a plenary session entitled Integrated Thinking: the key to improved performance and value creation at the World Congress of Accountants that is taking place in Rome.

The session will be chaired by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) chief executive Paul Druckman.

He will be moderating a panel of speakers which includes outgoing IFAC president Warren Allen and C-suite executives from Brazil's Itau Unibanco, South African mining company Gold Fields and German listed electric utility company EnBW.

Ahead of the plenary session on Integrated Reporting (IR) The Accountant recently discussed IR with global accountancy stakeholders on the occasion of its annual UK country survey.

"I think IR shouldn't be seen as a sustainability issue any more. It's about explaining how companies create value for their shareholders over time," the ICAEW chief executive Michael Izza, told the TA.

He explained that IR started as a sustainability reporting theme but evolved into a "spin-off, taking a life of its own" under the IIRC's auspices.

"The whole IR's ethos is changing the way people think about meaningful reporting and about what they do in their business," he said.

"I mean there's a small revolution going on. We hope it becomes a big one," Izza continued.

Mandatory or voluntary
Asked whether this "small revolution" will need at some point help from regulators to spread, Izza, who sits at the IIRC Council, said:

"We've talked about that at the IIRC and I think there are clearly advantages to making IR either mandatory or recommended by perhaps stock exchanges, as in the case of South Africa. But if investors were willing to pay a premium for companies that explain how value is created, I'm pretty sure everybody would move to IR."

At the ACCA, director of external affairs Sue Almond said the IIRC would not probably seek a regulatory way to implement IR.

"The IIRC is probably keener that IR remains a market-driven exercise aimed at meeting the market's need. The critical point now is to see if investors and stakeholders feel IR really meets those needs," Almond says.

Asked whether a mandatory EU-wide adoption of IR, similar to what happened with IFRS a decade ago, would science fiction Almond replied:

"I would be surprised if that happens in that way. There is a lot of focus on non-financial reporting at EU level but there hasn't been a huge regulatory take up on IR side. The case of IFRS was different because it was already a framework that was well developed. Although, it wouldn't be impossible," she said.

Izza commented jokingly that making IR mandatory across countries would make Druckman's life much easier. Regarding an hypothetical EU directive, for example, whereby IR became compulsory, Izza added:

"I think it could really happen. It's a trend that it's happening in society in general and certainly in the tax world. It's a move towards transparency. IR is about telling people how you create value: don't put things in a black box, show what you are doing."

Scepticism
Not everyone, however, share the same optimism about how the development of IR will play out. University of Essex accounting professor Prem Sikka said he remains sceptical of initiatives like IR and wondered how it changes the nature of accounting.

"Even if it worked, we still don't know what investors do with information. These are just gimmicks and we have seen them before. In the eighties we had multicolumn reporting, which it was going to revolutionise accounting. Then we had value added statements. They all came and went. So I'm afraid I'm a bit sceptical about these things in my old age," Sikka said.

Sikka added that even if there were merits to build the case of IR, it does resolve perennial questions in accounting.

"What's an asset, what's a liability, when to recognise income...those issues are not resolved in any way whatsoever," he said in reference to UK retailer Tesco's accounting irregularity, which overstated half-year profits to the tune of £263m ($m).

 

Related story:

UK survey 2014: The British profession's not for EU-turning

Top Content

    2018 Digital Accountancy forum and awards: Digital transformation

    The Accountant presents highlights from The Digital Accountancy Forum & Awards 2018 panel discussions

    read more

    2018 Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: Tech deep dive

    The second panel session of the day saw experts discuss how new technologies should not just be seen as a threat, and could be used to improve accounting.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The power of data

    The third panel discussion of the day saw panellists discuss some of the worries their clients have had, how to overcome them, and how data and technology are providing real business opportunities.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The next generation

    With young people more mobile, and technology changing the industry rapidly, the final panel session of the Digital Accountancy Forum looked at how firms would need to adapt to the new reality

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.