• Register
Return to: Home > News > FRC: Don’t expect Carillion resolution until ‘well into 2019’

FRC: Don’t expect Carillion resolution until ‘well into 2019’

The UK’s Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has said it expects its investigation into KPMG for its work on Carillion to continue well into 2019.

The news came alongside a reveal that it launched a further investigation into thee Big Four firm in November, also in relation to its work for the Carillion, which collapsed in January last year.

The November investigation is in relation to the provision of materials to the FRC by KPMG in connection with the FRC’s Audit Quality Review into aspects of the audit of Carillion for the year end 2016.

The FRC said that the decision to open this investigation followed matters self-reported by KPMG.

The regulator is currently investigating KPMG’s audits of Carillion (2014-2017) and the conduct of two former finance directors, Richard Adam and Zafar Khan.

One of the investigation’s main area of focus has been the financial performance of Carillion’s major contracts in both the construction and services divisions, and whether Carillion management and its auditors ensured that this was appropriately reported in its financial statements.

The investigations are also considering conduct relating to pension liabilities, goodwill, cash disclosures and going concern.

The regulator said it is investigating significant quantities of documents and has conducted detailed interviews with audit team members and Carillion senior executives. Further interviews are planned for early 2019.

In its statement today, the FRC acknowledged that the update comes due to the ‘significant public interest’ in the collapse of Carillion and the role KPMG played in its collapse.

KPMG

KPMG UK has suspended one of its partners, Peter Meehan, and three other members of staff in relation to the information they provided to the FRC in regards to Carillion.

KPMG could not comment on individual cases of suspensions but did provide a statement:  “Over the past year, we have been performing a thorough review of the firm’s audit of Carillion. Our investigation included the audit team’s response to the FRC’s Audit Quality Review undertaken during 2017, which looked at aspects of the 2016 audit.

“Concerns were identified in connection with a small number of documents provided to the FRC’s team during the routine Audit Quality Review. On discovery of this information, we immediately reported our findings to the FRC.

“It is important to note that this took place after the signing of the audit opinion and we have not identified any evidence or indication that it had any impact on the audit conclusions of Carillion. At this stage the investigation is ongoing and as such, the firm has reached no conclusion around individual responsibility.

“We are taking this matter extremely seriously and have engaged outside legal counsel to conduct an investigation into the circumstances of the Audit Quality Review and the conduct of the individuals involved. We acted swiftly and decisively and will continue to take all necessary steps to deal with this, including cooperating fully with the FRC.”

Reviews

The collapse of Carillion created much public and political scrutiny of the role of the auditors in the collapse of large listed companies. This scrutiny in turn led to the Kingman Review of the whether or not the FRC is fit for purpose and the Competition and Markets Authority’s investigation into the statutory audit market.

A report made by parliamentary select committees in to the collapse of Carillion lambasted the FRC for being ‘chronically passive’ as it had identified concerns with Carillion’s accounts in 2015 but failed to follow them up.

The Kingman Review has since called for the FRC to be replaced with a new regulator, tentatively called the Audit, Reporting and Governance authority (ARGA), which would be accountable to Parliament and have new powers and leadership to better serve the public interest.

Top Content

    Addressing tax challenges and the digitisation of the economy

    As the economy becomes even more globalised through digital sources, the tax systems currently in place need to be scrutinised to examine whether they are still fit for current and emerging business models. Joe Pickard reports on the OECD’s approach to this issue.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.