• Register
Return to: Home > News > FRC criticises ‘inconsistent’ audit work on Other Information

FRC criticises ‘inconsistent’ audit work on Other Information

Auditors’ work on the Other Information (OI) section of company reports outside of the financial statements do not meet the requirements of Auditing Standards consistently, according to the UK’s Financial Reporting Council (FRC).

The FRC’s audit quality thematic review on OI in its annual report found that inconsistency in the extent of the work in part reflected the non-perspective requirements in the Audit Standards.

The report found firms’ own guidance to their auditors ‘lacks prescription’, which has led to different approaches being taken to this work by different audit teams within the same firm.

It was noted that the amount of information included in the OI has grown significantly, and in most cases it is now larger than the financial statements themselves.

If this information is materially mis-stated it can undermine the credibility of the audited financial statements or may ‘inappropriately influence the decisions of users of the annual report’. 

The FRC’s acting executive director for audit Mike Suffield said: “Auditors must improve the extent and quality of the work that they perform on the front end of the annual report. The FRC will review the requirements on auditors in this area in Auditing Standards, as part of its current project reviewing Auditing Standards, to see what changes are necessary to help improve the work carried out.

“We will also consider in detail the requirements for assurance over information included in the front end as part of our recently announced project on the future of corporate reporting.”

The FRC outlined methods it expected auditors to implement in order to improve their quality and consistency of their work on OI:

  • Undertake more targeted procedures, based upon more prescriptive guidance from audit firms;
  • Place greater emphasis on their review of key non-financial information;
  • Increase their scepticism and pay more attention to the completeness of information;
  • Require Boards to prepare, on a timely basis, appropriate documentation to support key areas of the OI; and
  • Ensure staff with appropriate experience and knowledge to identify potential material misstatements and inconsistencies are assigned to review the OI.

Top Content

    2018 Digital Accountancy forum and awards: Digital transformation

    The Accountant presents highlights from The Digital Accountancy Forum & Awards 2018 panel discussions

    read more

    2018 Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: Tech deep dive

    The second panel session of the day saw experts discuss how new technologies should not just be seen as a threat, and could be used to improve accounting.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The power of data

    The third panel discussion of the day saw panellists discuss some of the worries their clients have had, how to overcome them, and how data and technology are providing real business opportunities.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The next generation

    With young people more mobile, and technology changing the industry rapidly, the final panel session of the Digital Accountancy Forum looked at how firms would need to adapt to the new reality

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.