• Register
Return to: Home > News > FRC blames corporate failures on lack of powers

FRC blames corporate failures on lack of powers

Stephen Haddrill, who is set to step down as the CEO of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), argued that corporate failures under the regulator was due to the lack of powers that it holds.

During a select committee meeting on the future of audit, held at Parliament, Haddrill was asked if more could have been done in the past to avoid major corporate failures.

The FRC has recently been named as a ‘toothless tiger’ and a regulator that does not exercise any powers, which has been brought to attention by members of the committee.

The lack of powers given to the FRC has caused limited effectiveness in the regulators work, according to Haddrill.

He argues that if the powers mentioned by John Kingman in the Kingman Review was given to the FRC, then this certainly would have prevented major corporate failures.

Haddrill said: “When we review the reports and the accounts of the company, we get the reports and the accounts and we ask the company a lot of questions. What we don’t have the ability to do is really go into the company and test those answers. And he (Kingman) recommends a power like the FSA who has to appoint an expert.”

He noted the FRC has placed proposals to the predecessor of the parliamentary committee back in 2016, asking for such powers. He added that with Kingman’s support there is hope that the government will take the request for powers forward.

The committee questioned the FRC regarding if anything more could have been done over the nine years with the FRC’s existing powers.

Haddrill admitted the introduction of audit firm monitoring and supervisory approach on a voluntary basis should have been introduced earlier.

Presently the firms have agreed to monitoring and supervision of themselves beyond just the inspection of individual audits. This voluntary action was brought in to change audit quality as a whole.

Reflecting back to Carillion, Haddrill stated that the approach should have been introduced back then.

However Haddrill stated that there was no regrets tied to having Sir John Kingman stepping in to provide suggestion on the regulators role.

He said: “I think any organisation must be committed to continuous improvement. There are some things in there that if we could have achieved them that would have been better.”

During the committee hearing, Haddrill was asked if the FRC disagreed with any of the recommendations highlighted in the Kingman review.

To which Haddrill said the review should have had more of a focus on the regulators effect on wider society.

Another disagreement regarding the review was about the staff on the board of the FRC, as Kingman discussed concerns over conflicts of interests of them possibly being too close to those they are meant to regulate.

Haddrill commented: “We do sometimes employ people who have had careers spanning two or three firms, so that would rather limit their ability and sometimes we move people around so that they don’t spend years and years working on the same firm because there is a risk of going native there, so we need to work out how to get a bit of operational flexibility.”


By Mishelle Thurai

Top Content

    Choosing the right location can have cast-iron benefits

    As Game of Thrones, one of the biggest television shows of all time, comes to an end, Joe Pickard looks at how tax incentives offered to television and film production companies help the wider economy.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.