• Register
Return to: Home > News > Standards > EFRAG study finds support for single model lease accounting

EFRAG study finds support for single model lease accounting

A majority of respondents in a European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) survey indicated a preference for the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to use a single model in their attempts to create a converged lease accounting standard.

The two boards have been attempting to create the new leasing standard based on the right of use model, whereby all leases would be recognised on the balance sheet provided the lessee has a right to use the asset.

To address early complaints from the US, leases were split into two types - Type A and Type B, with the determining factor being whether the asset being leased was equipment or property, respectively.

The boards released an exposure draft on lease accounting in May 2013, but the majority of the feedback pointed to it being too complicated, and a March 2014 meeting between the FASB and IASB revealed divisions on how to proceed.

The IASB argued in favour of a more singular approach, with most leases being classified as Type A leases, whereby amortization of the asset would be recognised separately from interest on the lease liability.

The FASB wanted a dual approach with most leases accounted for as Type B leases, where they are recognised as a single total lease.

The majority of respondents to the EFRAG survey argued for a single model of lease accounting, along the Type A model lines, whereby amortization of the asset would be recognised separately from interest on the lease liability.

Within this group there was a difference of opinion, however. Some respondents considered that having a single model would reduce implementation and costs.

Some only supported a single Type A model on the grounds that the distinction between lease and service contracts be improved in the eventual standard.

If this distinction was not developed to a sufficient standard, they indicated they would support a resolution based on IAS 17, the IASB's current standard related to lease accounting.

Others indicated support for a single Type A model, but with exceptions for leases on properties, while some opposed a single model altogether, saying it would not reflect the economic differences between various types of leases.

Additionally, respondents said the IASB and FASB needed to make "broad and systematic" simplifications to the IASB and FASB's revised Exposure draft, published in May 2013.

The majority of respondents also were in favour of exemptions in the standard for non-core assets to help reduce complexity. They did acknowledge defining what 'core' and 'non-core' meant could be challenging in practise, though.

The survey was conducted in conjunction with the national standard setters of the UK, France, Germany and Italy, and involved 44 respondents from 10 countries, representing a number of industries.

Related story

IASB and FASB fail to agree on lease accounting

Related link

European Financial Reporting Advisory Group

Top Content

    2018 Digital Accountancy forum and awards: Digital transformation

    The Accountant presents highlights from The Digital Accountancy Forum & Awards 2018 panel discussions

    read more

    2018 Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: Tech deep dive

    The second panel session of the day saw experts discuss how new technologies should not just be seen as a threat, and could be used to improve accounting.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The power of data

    The third panel discussion of the day saw panellists discuss some of the worries their clients have had, how to overcome them, and how data and technology are providing real business opportunities.

    read more

    Digital Accountancy Forum and Awards: The next generation

    With young people more mobile, and technology changing the industry rapidly, the final panel session of the Digital Accountancy Forum looked at how firms would need to adapt to the new reality

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.