• Register
Return to: Home > News > British Overseas territories reject UK Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill

British Overseas territories reject UK Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill

A number of the British overseas territories named in an amendment in the UK Governments Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill have already spoken out against it.

In the UK, an amendment to the bill was tabled by MP Margaret Hodge aimed at forcing British overseas territories to publish details of the true owners of companies based there in a public register. This came on the back of leaks such as the panama papers, which helped reveal the complicated web of company and asset ownership in so called ‘tax havens’.

The government initially resisted the amendment on the grounds of damaging the territories’ autonomy, however eventually acquiesced in the face of defeat.

It is on these grounds of autonomy that the Government of Bermuda rejected the decision.

Bermuda’s Premier and Finance Minister, David Burt JP said: “The action taken in the UK Parliament today signals a retrograde step in the relations between the United Kingdom and the Overseas Territories. In the case of Bermuda, after fifty years of constitutionally sanctioned internal self-government it is regrettable that we see this ‘about face’ which fails to acknowledge this long history of enshrined democratic freedoms. The Government of Bermuda maintains that the constitutional position is clear and we will take necessary steps to ensure our constitution is respected.”

Similarly, prior to the vote, British Virgin Islands premier and minister of finance D. Orlando Smith said: “I reject the idea that our democratically elected government should be superseded by the UK parliament, especially in the area of financial services, which has been formally entrusted to the BVI people,” adding it would undermine the constitutional relationships and trust between the BVI and UK.

Similarly, the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) said that it was concerned the provisions could prove discriminatory to the British Virgin Islands, and also said it thought it would contravene the constitutional arrangement between the islands and the UK

In turn, Fabian Picardo, chief minister for Gibraltar, described the move as ‘an unacceptable act of modern colonialism which would in effect overturn democracy in the relevant territory.’

He added: “I cannot emphasise enough to you how unacceptable this is and how contrary to the direction of travel of the constitutional development of Gibraltar such a step would be.”

Record defending

The countries also defended their openness and their track records in financial transparency.

Picardo, for example, noted that Gibraltar was already independently committed to the establishment of a public register of ultimate beneficial ownership when an international standard on this subject is agreed, and that it was committed to the existing OECD international standard as regards the sharing of registers of ultimate beneficial ownership.

Burt, meanwhile, said: “It is well known that Bermuda already has some of the most responsive and comprehensive registers of beneficial ownership of companies registered in this jurisdiction and that those registers are updated in real time on every share transfer. This has been the position for almost 80 years.

“This information has long been available to legitimate international competent authorities via the OECD Multilateral Tax Convention which has a 117 participating countries. In 2016, we agreed to share beneficial ownership information as requested by the National Crime Agency and HMRC within 24 hour turnaround or one hour for urgent enquiries.“

The new measures will not apply to Britain’s crown dependencies: Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man.

Top Content

    Addressing tax challenges and the digitisation of the economy

    As the economy becomes even more globalised through digital sources, the tax systems currently in place need to be scrutinised to examine whether they are still fit for current and emerging business models. Joe Pickard reports on the OECD’s approach to this issue.

    read more

    Primary financial statements: a game changer in reporting?

    International Accounting Standards Board chair Hans Hoogervorst delivered a speech at the Seminario International sobre NIIF y NIF, organised by the Consejo Mexicano de Normas de Información Financiera in Mexico. The Accountant presents the highlights.

    read more

    FASB readies standards for the netflix generation

    The US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has updated its accounting standard for entertainment, with a specific eye on keeping up to date with how episodic content, such as television programmes, is consumed in the modern world. Jonathan Minter reports.

    read more

    Brexit: why it takes two to tango

    Former TA editor Vincent Huck, now editor of Insurance Asset Risk, looks at why Brexit might unleash geopolitical intrigue in Europe’s accounting standard-setting scene – and why IFRS 17 will be an incredible source of opportunity for firms in the coming years.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.